Welcome to Bennett's Study

From the Author of No Land an Island and Unconscionable

Pondering Alphabetic SOLUTIONS: Peace, Politics, Public Affairs, People Relations

http://www.bennettponderingpeacepoliticssolutions.com/

http://www.bennettponderingpeacepoliticssolutions.com/author/

http://www.bennettponderingpeacepoliticssolutions.com/buy/

UNCONSCIONABLE: http://www.unconscionableusforeignrelations.com/ http://www.unconscionableusforeignrelations.com/author/ http://www.unconscionableusforeignrelations.com/book/ http://www.unconscionableusforeignrelations.com/excerpt/ http://www.unconscionableusforeignrelations.com/contact/ http://www.unconscionableusforeignrelations.com/buy/ SearchTerm=Carolyn+LaDelle+Bennett http://www2.xlibris.com/books/webimages/wd/113472/buy.htm http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/08UNCONSCIONABLE/prweb12131656.htm http://bookstore.xlibris.com/AdvancedSearch/Default.aspx? http://bookstore.xlibris.com/Products/SKU-000757788/UNCONSCIONABLE.aspx

http://todaysinsight.blogspot.com

Showing posts with label Stephen Lendman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stephen Lendman. Show all posts

Friday, April 18, 2014

Deliberately disastrous U.S. Anti-Russia Rhetoric

Concerns about American recklessness in talk and actions
Editing by Carolyn Bennett

One voice does not make for truth or understanding but for a tyranny of the few; and of the masses a learned ignorance, a deliberate, oblivious, dangerous ignorance.

This morning I has listening to one of the “oldies” radio stations in my geographical area and had finally had enough from a relatively new (and inappropriate) addition to the station’s music (non-music) lineup, the demonizing pejorative propagandistic commentary of Tom Brokaw; and had to ask the station to ditch the gentlemen. For me, today’s commentary was right over the top in its bashing of the Russian Federation’s head of state Vladimir Putin, calling him what American irresponsible pundits and flacks in the past and present have called leaders such as Manuel Noriega, Saddam Hussein, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Bashar al-Assad, Muammar al- Qaddafi and others ─ “Strongman.” Having framed his subject disparagingly, Brokaw was off on the usual corporate media/government rant. My feedback to “Oldies Rochester” dot com suggested that
Whether or not the actions or styles of leadership of other heads of state are acceptable to us (or expedient in the moment), whether or not we like certain leaders is irrelevant.  
We Americans have no moral or legal standing for condemning any other nations and peoples; and even if we did, this kind of demonizing (immature, deliberately crude) behavior dirties relations among peoples and nations, including the USA.
Then I came across like thinkers. I am not alone in my concerns about the quality and character of U.S. relations with the world; and related to that, the accuracy and unbiased nature of information Americans receive and their depth of knowledge and understanding of other countries and peoples and our connections with them.

Earlier this year during the Winter Games in Sochi, journalist Peter Lavelle was speaking on RT’s Op-Edge program. This is some of what he said: “The level of journalistic malpractice committed against Russia blinds Western electorates, poisons public opinion, and emboldens the reckless political class.… Cheap shots, lazy reporting and maniacal commentary are a form of entertainment served up by Western mainstream media.  
… After the incessant demonization Russia gets from mainstream media, it is quite remarkable that the Kremlin continues to work closely with the West on issues that impact geopolitical stability ─ Afghanistan, Iran, Syria, nuclear proliferation, terrorist threats, food security, and the narcotics trade. 
Western publics rarely, if ever, learn about these kinds cooperation from their media. This is truly regrettable.
A few days ago, in  light of U.S. threats and bashing surrounding the Ukrainian conflict, author and commentator Stephen Lendman continued to raise concerns about the character of U.S. foreign relations, citing the recklessness in U.S. rhetoric. “Reckless comments heighten tensions,” Lendman wrote. “They do so irresponsibly. Rhetoric risks becoming policy…. Great conflicts start this way.… Containing Russia has been the longstanding policy, reflecting U.S. hegemonic ambitions.…   

“In January, Pentagon officials raised concerns about Russian ground-launched cruise missile tests [but they] are silent about their own naked aggression,” which has been endless ─ “killing millions” of people ─ in multiple theaters in the post-9/11 period. “Russia,” Lendman says, “is a powerful force for peace … up against a belligerent monster … headquartered in Washington.…” Its priorities: “Eliminating a major rival [Russia]. Marginalizing, weakening, isolating, and co-opting [Russia].Though “Escalated tensions risk belligerent East/West confrontation, Lendman writes,  
Whenever Washington wages war or plans one, media scoundrels march in lockstep. They regurgitate official propaganda ad nauseam, substituting lies for truth. 
[Reckless rhetoric] is relentless. It persists daily. Big Lies drown out truth.
Sources and notes 
“Journalistic malpractice & the dangers of Russia-bashing,” February 9, 2014, during an earlier period of Western Russia bashing, during the Winter Olympic Games at Sochi, Op-Edge, http://rt.com/op-edge/western-media-russia-bashing-293/
  
United States-born and educated Peter J. Lavelle has lived in Eastern Europe and Russia for more than 25 years, has worked as a lecturer at the University of Warsaw, a market researcher for Colgate-Palmolive, and an investment analyst for brokerage firms, including Russia’s Alfa-Bank. He is journalist and host of CrossTalk, presented by the English-language channel RT (Russia Today) and has hosted RT's programs IMHO and In Context and a monthly business program called “On the Money.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Lavelle
 “Reckless Russia Bashing Persists” by Stephen Lendman, April 5, 2014, http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2014/04/05/reckless-russia-bashing-persists
Stephen Lendman is a writer, syndicated columnist, activist, and broadcaster. Since 2007, he has hosted “a progressive radio show” at The Progressive Radio News Hour on The Progressive Radio Network. Lendman writes for MoneyNewsNow.com and VeteransToday.com and is author of Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity and How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War, http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/lendman/

Clear Channel Communications dominates what we hear over “public” airwaves.  Wikipedia notes 448 stations outside the Top 100 DMA (designated market area) markets plus another 91 stations for sale which may or may not be in the top 100 DMAs. The TV stations formerly owned by Clear Channel were sold to Providence Equity Partners, a private equity firm, on April 23, 2007, with the deal closing in late November 2007. 185 radio stations were to have been sold to GoodRadio.TV LLC until the sale fell apart over financing. and another 177 stations have been sold to other entities. Another 201 stations are up for sale. DMA:  a media market, broadcast market, media region, designated market area (DMA), television market area, or simply market is a region where the population can receive the same (or similar) television and radio station offerings, and may also include other types of media including newspapers and Internet content. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_broadcast_stations_owned_by_Clear_Channel
 _______________________________________
  
Bennett's books are available in New York State independent bookstores: Lift Bridge Bookshop: www.liftbridgebooks.com [Brockport, NY]; Sundance Books: http://www.sundancebooks.com/main.html [Geneseo, NY]; Mood Makers Books: www.moodmakersbooks.com [City of Rochester, NY]; Dog Ears Bookstore and Literary Arts Center: www.enlightenthedog.org/ [Buffalo, NY]; Burlingham Books – ‘Your Local Chapter’: http://burlinghambooks.com/ [Perry, NY 14530]; The Bookworm: http://www.eabookworm.com/ [East Aurora, NY] • See also: World Pulse: Global Issues through the eyes of Women: http://www.worldpulse.com/ http://www.worldpulse.com/pulsewire http://www.facebook.com/#!/bennetts2ndstudy
 ____________________________________

Saturday, February 9, 2013

Pres ignores environmental appeal, panders to Big Oil, chooses sub-prime banker for Interior


“It is clear nominee has a passion for national parks but … will she value our wildlands and wildlife in the face of endless pressure by industry to drill…─ Center for Biological Diversity
Re-reporting, editing by 
Carolyn Bennett

BP Oil Spill 
In “Big Oil’s in Good Hands with Obama’s New Interior Secretary,” Stephen Lendman first recalls the anti-environmental stewardship of the previous secretary.

BP Oil Spill 
Outgoing Interior Secretary Ken Salazar

Supported BP’s Deepwater Horizon operation
 
Ignored environmental risks
BP Oil Spill 
Approved BP’s exploration plan with no environmental analysis
Permitted Gulf of Mexico disaster
Granted ‘categorical exemptions,’ after BP’s rig exploded, to expand offshore drilling
Surpassed the previous government’s anti-environmental policies

Shared anti-environmental culpability (with the current government) in having backed dangerous nuclear expansion and remained beholden to oil and gas interests, continued an official  drill-drill-drill policy, paid lip service without progressive action on  environmental concerns

Lendman said Kenneth Lee Salazar came into the office with a history of anti-environmentalism. As junior senator from Colorado, he opposed fuel efficiency, supported unrestricted oil and gas drilling on federal lands. He voted against Gulf of Mexico drilling protections and fought them as Interior Secretary. On resigning from Interior, he leaves “a deplorable environmental record,” Lendman said.

And he seemed in lockstep with his president, as indicated in comments by former Interior Secretary Bruce Babbit, quoted by Lendman:

So far under [President Barack] Obama, industry has been winning the race as it obtains more and more land for oil and gas.

Over the past four years, the industry has leased more than 6 million acres, compared with only 2.6 million acres permanently protected.

In the Obama era, land conservation has received little or no consideration.


A
n appeal from a broad spectrum of groups concerned with the environment and related issues was sent to the U.S. President last month urging him to nominate a qualified person to head the Department of the Interior.
  
“The selection of the next Interior Secretary … is an important moment to place renewed emphasis and urgency on some of the most critical issues of our age, including climate change, the protection of endangered species and preservation of water and wild lands,” the letter said. The opening of the position following the resignation of Secretary Salazar offers “an opportunity to continue a great American tradition of expanding parks and wildlife protection,” the letter said.

Cheetah
“Congressman Grijalva is the right person to oversee tribal relations in a way that is respectful and beneficial both to our Native American communities and the country as a whole.”

Signed by a broad coalition of 260 conservation, Hispanic, recreation, animal welfare, religious, labor, youth, business and women’s groups, the letter urged President Obama to nominate Rep. Raúl Grijalva, currently the ranking member of the House Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands, and a leading Democrat on the House Natural Resources Committee.

As ranking member and former chairman of the House Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands,” the letter said, “Congressman Grijalva has been a tireless and effective leader on conservation and land management issues faced by the Department of the Interior. Congressman Grijalva has unparalleled expertise with Native Americans and Indian tribes, a strong understanding of border issues, a well‐established and pragmatic conservation ethic, and valuable experience with a wide variety of funding challenges.…
Biodiversity
North Bengal

“We strongly believe Congressman Grijalva exemplifies the modern and forward thinking vision of the Department of the Interior.”


T
he President effectively ignored the recommendation and nominated a sports equipment seller and a shady-business-practices banker for the position of U.S. Secretary of the Interior.

Lendman reported in “Big Oil’s in Good Hands with Obama’s New Interior Secretary Sally Jewell” that in the years 1996 to 2000, Jewell had been “president of the Washington Mutual (WaMu) commercial banking group,” a concern that, before it collapsed, had been “the nation’s largest mortgage lender and “rife with fraud.” An investigation by the U.S. Senate, he said, “had discovered gross deception: loan officers receiving bonuses for speedy subprime mortgage closures, overcharging, and levying stiff prepayment penalties.”

Sally Jewell
Salazar’s successor
 Incoming Interior Secretary Sally Jewell

In his February 8 article at Global Research, Stephen Lendman assessed the chances of getting new, progressive leadership at Interior and said Sally Jewell “was not chosen to be a friend of the earth. Responsible stewardship,” he said, “is excluded from her mandate.

She’ll be low key and soft spoken.
She’ll conceal official policy.
She is Big Oil’s woman in Washington
Whatever Big Oil wants it gets.

T
he Keystone XL Pipeline System construction to carry “one of the world’s dirtiest fuels (tar sands oil) … to double America’s dirty tar sands oil supply and increase environmental toxicity exponentially”; on a route, likely “to devastate ecosystems, pollute water sources, jeopardize public health” ─ Sally Jewell, he said, will give the full backing of the U.S. Department of Interior.

The Keystone Pipeline System is a pipeline system to transport synthetic crude oil and diluted bitumen (‘dilbit’) from the Athabasca oil sands region in northeastern Alberta, Canada, to multiple destinations in the United States, which include refineries in Illinois, the Cushing oil distribution hub in Oklahoma, and proposed connections to refineries along the Gulf Coast of Texas. [Wikipedia note]

“She will oversee oil and gas production and give free rein to industry,” Lendman said. “No matter the stakes, Big Oil wants it, so do Republicans, many Democrats, and President Obama; and Jewell will support it as part of her mandate at Interior. She won’t disappoint.”

Issues warning
Destinies linked
Biodiversity
Friends of life concerned, guarded, strangely hopeful

Following the president’s public lauding of his sports equipment/shady banking candidate for Interior, the Center for Biological Diversity last Wednesday responded, dejectedly, it seemed, as they too had urged the appointment of Congressman Grijalva to the post. Executive Secretary, Kierán Suckling said, “America’s public lands and endangered species are in dire need of visionary leadership. We hope Sally Jewell brings the same determination and transparency to running the Department of the Interior as she did to REI.”

[Recreational Equipment Inc. (REI), President and CEO Sally Jewell sells outdoor gear and sporting goods through dozens of U.S. retail outlets, sales approaching $2 billion annually (Lendman reports)].

“The next Interior secretary will face monumental tasks in protecting species, preserving public lands, safeguarding clean air and water and preserving a healthy climate for future generations,” the Center for Biological Diversity’s Executive Secretary said.

“I
t’s vital that our oceans, forests, deserts and rivers are protected and preserved and not turned over to big businesses looking to make a profit from our publicly owned resources. 

We hope that Sally Jewell shows brave leadership in finally addressing the climate crisis, reversing the tide of species extinctions and protecting wild lands that are vital to wildlife and people alike.

Sally Jewell
“It is clear the secretary of the Interior nominee has a passion for national parks. But the challenge is whether she will value our wildlands and wildlife in the face of endless pressure by industry to drill for fossil fuels in areas within Interior’s jurisdiction

If she can stand strong against bad ideas such as Arctic oil drilling and fracking (hydraulic fracturing) on public lands, then she will likely be a success.

“Nature needs a true champion at this point in history.”

A
t the website for Center for Biological Diversity, its mission is rooted in the belief “that the welfare of human beings is deeply linked to nature — to the existence in our world of a vast diversity of wild animals and plants.

Because diversity has intrinsic value, and because its loss impoverishes society, we work to secure a future for all species, great and small, hovering on the brink of extinction.

We do so through science, law and creative media, with a focus on protecting the lands, waters and climate that species need to survive.

We want those who come after us to inherit a world where the wild is still alive.



Sources and notes

“Big Oil’s in Good Hands with Obama’s New Interior Secretary Sally Jewell” (by Stephen Lendman), Global Research, February 8, 2013, http://www.globalresearch.ca/big-oils-in-good-hands-with-obamas-new-interior-secretary-sally-jewell/5322305

Author and broadcaster Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. His latest book is Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity.”

His blog site: sjlendman.blogspot.com, his broadcasts at the Progressive Radio News Hour, the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time, Saturdays and Sundays at noon. Discussions archived, http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour. See also http://www.dailycensored.com/big-oils-in-good-hands-with-sally-jewell/
http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanII.html

Statement released February 6, 2013, by the Center for Biological Diversity on the nomination of Sally Jewell for Interior Secretary ─ Executive director of the Center for Biological Diversity Kierán Suckling:

“Center for Biological Diversity Statement on Nomination of Sally Jewell for Interior Secretary,” February 6, 2013, http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2013/jewell-02-06-2013.html

The Center for Biological Diversity is a national, nonprofit conservation organization with more than 450,000 members and online activists dedicated to the protection of endangered species and wild places.

http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/
http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/about/index.html

Letter December 10, 2012, to President Barack Obama
Re: Secretary of the Interior, http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/programs/public_lands/pdfs/obama_interior_2012_grijalva.pdf
Also at Friends of the Earth, http://www.foe.org/news/news-releases/2013-01-massive-coalition-calls-on-president-obama-to-nomina

“Massive coalition calls on President Obama to nominate Rep. Raúl Grijalva as interior secretary,” posted January 16, 2013 (Adam Russell)

Signers of the letter to President Obama recommending Rep. Raúl Grijalva of Arizona for Secretary of Interior included: Latinos Go Green, Latina Lista, Ciudadanos Del Karso, Vegabajenos Impulsando Ambiental Sustentable, Center for Biological Diversity, Center for Food Safety, Women Food and Agriculture Network, Friends of the Earth, Rainforest Action Network, American Forests, Labor Network for Sustainability, Federation of Western Outdoor Clubs, Christians Caring for Creation, Public Citizen, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, Food and Water Watch, New Mexico Wilderness Alliance, Committee on Idaho's High Desert, Southwest Montana Wildlands Association, Washington Wild, Wild Utah Project, Wildlife Alliance of Maine, Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, South Florida Wildlands Association, Tennessee Environmental Council, the Wisconsin Resource Protection Council, the Arizona Wilderness Coalition, Desert Protective Council, Friends of Animals, Great Old Broads for Wilderness, Green Delaware, Kentucky Heartwood, Kids vs. Global Warming, United Church of Christ Network for Environmental & Economic Responsibility, Rocky Mountain Wild, Sea Turtle Conservancy, Tucson Audubon, Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment, West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, West North Carolina Alliance, Wild Idaho Rising and WildWest Institute.

Fracking

Hydraulic fracturing is the propagation of fractures in a rock layer by a pressurized fluid.

Induced hydraulic fracturing or hydro-fracturing (commonly known as fracing, fraccing or fracking) is a technique used to release petroleum, natural gas (including shale gas, tight gas, and coal seam gas), or other substances for extraction. This type of fracturing creates fractures from a wellbore drilled into reservoir rock formations.

Some hydraulic fractures form naturally—certain veins or dikes are examples—and can create conduits along which gas and petroleum from source rocks may migrate to reservoir rocks.  

Opponents of hydraulic fracturing point to potential effects on the environment: contamination of ground water, risks to air quality, the migration of gases and hydraulic fracturing chemicals to the surface, surface contamination from spills and flow back and related health effects. For these reasons hydraulic fracturing has come under scrutiny internationally, with some countries suspending or banning it.

Proponents of hydraulic fracturing point to the economic benefits from vast amounts of formerly inaccessible hydrocarbons the process can extract. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_fracturing


Keystone XL (Wikipedia note continued)

The Keystone Pipeline System consists of the operational ‘Keystone Pipeline and ‘Keystone-Cushing Extension’, and two proposed pipeline expansion segments, referred to as Keystone XL Pipeline and the Gulf Coast Project. After the Keystone XL pipeline segments are completed, American crude oil would enter the XL pipelines at Baker, Montana and Cushing, Oklahoma.

The Keystone XL has faced lawsuits from oil refineries and criticism from environmentalists and some members of the United States Congress.

In January 2012, President Obama rejected the application amid protests about the pipeline’s impact on Nebraska’s environmentally sensitive Sand Hills region.

On March 22 Obama endorsed the building of its southern half that begins in Cushing, Oklahoma.

On March 22, the President said in Cushing: ‘Today, I’m directing my administration to cut through the red tape, break through the bureaucratic hurdles, and make this project a priority, to go ahead and get it done.’  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keystone_Pipeline


_____________________________________________

Bennett's books are available in New York State independent bookstores: Lift Bridge Bookshop: www.liftbridgebooks.com [Brockport, NY]; Sundance Books: http://www.sundancebooks.com/main.html [Geneseo, NY]; Mood Makers Books: www.moodmakersbooks.com [City of Rochester, NY]; Dog Ears Bookstore and Literary Arts Center: www.enlightenthedog.org/ [Buffalo, NY]; Burlingham Books – ‘Your Local Chapter’: http://burlinghambooks.com/ [Perry, NY 14530]; The Bookworm: http://www.eabookworm.com/ [East Aurora, NY] • See also: World Pulse: Global Issues through the eyes of Women: http://www.worldpulse.com/ http://www.worldpulse.com/pulsewire http://www.facebook.com/#!/bennetts2ndstudy

_____________________________________________

Saturday, May 5, 2012

Unspeakable U.S.- prolonged Afghanistan-Pakistan tragedies


Body of burned Afghan child
Whose lives have value; who is prized, who despised, who is cherished, who discarded?
Compiled and edited by Carolyn Bennett

Background

Afghanistan had nothing to do with 9/11.

Afghanistan has never threatened America. If the U.S. occupation ends, Afghanistan, still, would not threaten the United States of America.

International law is clear: No nation may attack another nation except in self-defense.

The U.S. war is lawless. Neither the UN Security Council nor the U.S. Congress authorized this invasion and occupation. The United States has not fought a legal war since World War II.

‘Al Qaeda’ is a U.S. creation.

Body of Afghan
The U.S. ‘War on terrorism’ [begun in 2001] … has not removed religious fundamentalism, which is the main cause of all miseries,” says the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan.” The U.S administration reinstalled warlords in power in Afghanistan, thus replacing one fundamentalist regime with another. Together with [Afghan President Hamid] Karzai, the U.S. government relies mostly on Northern Alliance criminal leaders who are as brutal and misogynist as the Taliban.

“RAWA believes that freedom and democracy cannot be donated; it is the duty of the people of a country to fight and achieve these values.  Under the U.S.-supported [Karzai] government,” RAWA says, “the sworn enemies of human rights, democracy and secularism have gripped their claws over our country and have attempted to restore their religious fascism on our people.

“Whenever fundamentalists exist as a military and political force in our injured land, the problem of Afghanistan will not be solved.”


ONGOING AGGRESSION

U.S.-Afghanistan
to take
U.S.- Iraq model
Perpetual Occupation (agreed under force) and grant of impunity
U.S./Afghanistan presidents’ secret in the dark

‘Status of forces’ or SOFA agreements set a framework under which United States forces operate abroad. These agreements, bilateral or multilateral, define the status of visiting military forces.  Wide-ranging particulars regarding the status of visiting forces may be set out “in a separate agreement” or the SOFA may be “part of a more comprehensive agreement.”

U.S. Defense (Pentagon) officials — negotiating with an ‘independent host nation’ — draft the provisions of a Status of Forces Agreement. “Occupied countries” have little say in the matter.

Stephen Lendman describes these agreements as “a modern-day version of 19th century China’s ‘extraterritoriality’ agreements, granting foreigners [visitors, occupiers] charged with crimes the ‘right’ to be tried by [the foreigners’] government and under that government’s domestic law.”
Host countries’ local courts are precluded “from exercising legal jurisdiction over American personnel.”

Impunity

With its enormous occupation of hundreds of known, shared, and secret bases in more than 150 countries, the U.S. presence “assures trouble,” Lendman says, that “includes murder, rape, theft, drunken driving, and other crimes.” This mass occupation also subjects local people to “unacceptable noise, pollution, environmental destruction, appropriated public land; and flagrant disregard for local laws, customs, and rights of ordinary people.”

Permanent U.S. occupations
Under “Status of Forces” agreements (mostly secret, some infractions “too embarrassing to reveal,” total number unknown), even U.S. foreigners who commit murder and rape are exempt from local judicial process — unless U.S. officials yield to local authorities. “Offenders,” Lendman says, are usually whisked out of countries.”

Endless lawlessness, endless aggression

Local people “have no say and virtually no chance of redress.” The most harmed in permanent occupations, the peoples of host countries, “lose control of their lives.”

Permanency is not built to be abandoned. Bases as in Iraq are “city size,” having “extensive infrastructure, command-and-control centers, foreign family accommodations in combat-free areas together with hospitals, schools, recreational facilities — virtually everything available in their native country.

The U.S. came to stay in Iraq and in Afghanistan.


UNSPEAKABLE SUFFERING
NATO under fire - Pakistan

 Death

Though it seems not to matter, the Afghan people want the United States out of their country and Americans, for different reasons, say they want the same; but, as Lendman puts it, Americans are mostly complacent and indifferent.

Together with impunity, atrocities seem unchecked and unending.

The annual report released today by the UN mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) said, “Afghan children, women and men continue to be killed in this war in ever-increasing numbers.”

A total of “3,021” civilians died last year, an 8 percent rise from 2010.

A total of “11,864 civilians” have died in the conflict in Afghanistan since 2007.

The report said most deaths attributed to NATO forces resulted from “attacks from the air” and the UN mission urged the 130,000 NATO force to review its tactics — particularly regarding aerial attacks — aimed at preventing civilian loss of life in all military operations.”

Afghanistan protest
Pakistan-based analyst Ali Sukhanver reflected on a truth too simple to avoid yet it is senselessly avoided.

“What if I hand over a loaded gun to a hungry teenager; naturally he would turn that gun on me and run away with all that I have in my pockets.

“This is what is happening in Afghanistan and in the tribal areas bordering Afghanistan and Pakistan.

“While commenting on the ever-increasing flames of violence — mistakenly called terrorism — we find it very easy to shift the whole blame on to the ‘hungry boy.’ No one blames the hands that hand the gun to him instead of taking care of his hunger.

“The situation in Afghanistan regarding the blazing fire of terrorism is never going to change unless the hands are cuffed which mock at the helplessness of Afghan people.

ANSWER Coalition
“Whatever is happening in Afghanistan is not terrorism but is instead a reaction and response to U.S. atrocities against the people of Afghanistan: paying back in the same coin… The hungry need bread not guns.” Kindness returns in kindness.

Hunger

In this foreign war of aggression, the people of Afghanistan also suffer hunger, conditions particularly threatening to people living in the mountains, people who are poor, and people who are very young. Afghanistan is one of the highest ranked countries in the world when it comes to problems with food security, says a report released today by the World Bank and Afghanistan’s Ministry of Economy.

iCasualties
War in Afghanistan
5-5-2012 update
Children below the age of five are hit the hardest. “At least 54 percent of Afghan children face serious challenges in getting adequate food and nutrition. At least 29 percent of the country’s population received insufficient calories and 20 percent have a poor diet.


U.S. IN AFGHANISTAN
Foreign raids, local resistance

It is unacceptable,” said an Afghan villager, “that they are coming and conducting night raids on the homes of innocent civilians.” Known by one name, Quasimullah said, “We want the president to put a stop to night raids as soon as possible.”

Today in a night raid in a residential area of Afghanistan’s northeastern Kunar Province, U.S. forces arrested five other people and killed a school teacher.

Over the past few months hundreds of civilians have died in U.S.-led operations in various parts of Afghanistan and Afghans have become increasingly outraged at what seems to be an endless number of the deadly assaults by the foreigners.

While the U.S. and Afghanistan presidents on Tuesday signed an agreement paving the way for retaining the U.S. presence through 2024, rallies across Afghanistan continued to press their condemnation of the endless killings and their demand for complete withdrawal of foreign troops from Afghanistan.

Tuesday morning in Afghanistan hundreds of Afghans demonstrated over the deaths of four children killed on Monday in the crossfire of Taliban, NATO and Afghan security forces in the southern Zabul province. They accused NATO troops of killing civilians.

Carrying the bodies of the four children (ages 8 to 12), protesters stopped traffic on the Kabul-Kandahar highway and chanted “death to America, death to Karzai.”


U.S. drone
U.S. IN PAKISTAN
Foreign strikes, local resistance

Earlier Saturday in Pakistan, an unmanned U.S. aircraft targeted a residential area less than 50 miles west of Miranshah, the main town in North Waziristan. The attack killed 20 people and injured many others.

The people of Pakistan as Afghanistan have continued to press their condemnation of U.S. assassination drone strikes.

In their recent defense of the use of killer drones, U.S. officials failed to give evidence of how killing people “saves lives” and continued killing with impunity.

Pakistani protests
Pakistani human rights lawyer Shahzad Akbar told Press TV that more than “2,800 of the 3,000 people killed over the past seven years in non-UN-sanctioned U.S. assassination drone strikes in Pakistan were civilians.”

Only 170 of the people killed in the aerial attacks on the northwestern tribal belt of Pakistan “have been identified as ‘militants,’” said the director of the Foundation for Fundamental Rights. What this means is that “over 2,800 people were civilians” killed on suspicion of being militant.

At the recent International Drone Summit sponsored in Washington by non government representatives, Senior Staff Attorney with the Center for Constitutional Rights, Maria LaHood, is reported saying, “As the Obama government expands its use of killer drones around the world, so must we increase our demands for transparency and accountability.”

Whatever else happens among Americans  how they feel and what they do — concerning the U.S. foreign relations model in violence, there is substantial evidence in news reports that the countries under aggression and occupation will not sit idly by.  


The longer U.S.-led fighting persists in Afghanistan and Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen and in other theaters of war, the stronger grows the resistance.



Sources and notes

RAWA
http://www.rawa.org/rawa.html

RAWA, the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan, was established in Kabul, Afghanistan, in 1977 as an independent political/social organization of Afghan women fighting for human rights and for social justice in Afghanistan


Before the Moscow-directed coup d’état of April 1978 in Afghanistan, RAWA’s activities were confined to agitation for women’s rights and democracy, but after the coup and particularly after the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in December 1979, RAWA became directly involved in the war of resistance.

Since the overthrow of the Soviet-installed puppet regime in 1992, the focus of RAWA’s political struggle has been against the fundamentalists’ and the ultra-fundamentalist Taliban’s criminal policies and atrocities against the people of Afghanistan in general and their incredibly ultra-male-chauvinistic and anti-woman orientation in particular.

The U.S. ‘War on terrorism’ [begun in 2001] … has not removed religious fundamentalism, the main cause of all miseries. The U.S administration’s reinstalling the warlords in power in Afghanistan is replacing one fundamentalist regime with another.  The U.S. government and [Afghan President Hamid] Karzai mostly rely on Northern Alliance criminal leaders who are as brutal and misogynist as the Taliban.

“RAWA believes that freedom and democracy cannot be donated; it is the duty of the people of a country to fight and achieve these values. Under the U.S.-supported government — the sworn enemies of human rights, democracy and secularism have gripped their claws over our country and attempt to restore their religious fascism on our people.

“Whenever fundamentalists exist as a military and political force in our injured land, the problem of Afghanistan will not be solved.

“Today RAWA’s mission for women’s rights is far from over and we have to work hard for the establishment of an independent, free, democratic and secular Afghanistan. We need the solidarity and support of all people around the world.”

http://www.rawa.org/rawa.html
Bay Area Indymedia, May 3, 2012

Hamid Karzai

Hamid Karzai (b. Dec. 24, 1957, Kandahār, Afghanistan) is an Afghan politician and (2004 -) first “elected” president of Afghanistan. Hamid Karzai was the son of the chief of the Popalzai Pashtuns. Both his father and grandfather served in the government of Mohammad Zahir Shah.
Amid discontent among Afghans, the Afghanistan Supreme Court in March 2009 ruled that Karzai could legally retain his position until the August election. Several opposition candidates emerged which the pro-Western Karzai “neutralized.”  The presidential election was held on August 20, 2009, and was followed by weeks of political turmoil. In September a preliminary count awarded Karzai almost 55 percent of the vote. [Britannica note]

Stephen Lendman in Chicago (U.S.) is author of How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War

“Afghanistan: Permanent Occupation Planned — besides elsewhere, America came to Iraq and Afghanistan to stay. Permanency is planned on city-sized super bases” (Stephen Lendman), May 3, 2012, http://www.rawa.org/temp/runews/2012/05/03/afghanistan-permanent-occupation-planned.html

“UN mission in Afghanistan says 2011 was fifth straight year that number of dead has risen, with 3,021 civilians killed, February 4, 2012, http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia/2012/02/201224101046976807.html

“U.S. atrocities in Afghanistan —  While commenting on the ever-increasing flames of violence, mistakenly called terrorism, we find it very easy to shift the whole blame on to the ‘hungry boy’: no one blames the hands that hand over the gun to him instead of taking care of his hunger” (Professor Ali Sukhanver) April 22, 2012,
http://www.rawa.org/temp/runews/2012/04/22/us-atrocities-in-afghanistan.html

“Concerns Over Lack of Food Safety in Afghanistan,” May 5, 2012, TOLOnews.com, 
http://tolonews.com/en/afghanistan/6121-concerns-over-lack-of-food-safety-in-afghanistan

TOLOnews, its terrestrial broadcast launched in August of 2010, is Afghan owned and operated and the country’s first 24-hour station dedicated to domestic and international news and current affairs. TOLOnews is an extension of Afghanistan’s TOLO TV, both part of the regional media organization MOBY Group. http://tolonews.com/en/about-us/4081-about-us

“U.S-led night raid kills teacher in Afghanistan,” May 5, 2012,
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/239749.html
War in Afghanistan by the numbers (AP and var. news sources)

“The Afghan war by the numbers —President Barack Obama arrived in Kabul on Tuesday to sign a strategic partnership agreement with Afghan President Hamid Karzai. The deal outlines the next phase of the U.S. role in Afghanistan after combat missions wind down at the end of 2014”  (The Associated Press), Tuesday, May 1, 2012 
Start of the war: October 7, 2001.
 Number of U.S. troops in Afghanistan: 88,000.
 Number of U.S. troops in Afghanistan at the war's peak: About 101,000 in 2010. Allies provided about 40,000.
 Withdrawal plans: 23,000 U.S. troops expected to come home by the end of the summer, leaving about 68,000 in Afghanistan. Most U.S. troops expected to be out of Afghanistan by the end of 2014, though the U.S. is expected to maintain a sizeable force of military trainers and a civilian diplomatic corps.
 Number of U.S. casualties: At least 1,828 members of the U.S. military killed as of Tuesday, according to an Associated Press count. According to the Defense Department, 15,786 U.S. service members have been wounded in hostile action.
 Afghan civilian casualties: According to the United Nations, 11,864 civilians were killed in the conflict between 2007, when the U.N. began reporting statistics, and the end of 2011.
 Cost of the war: $443 billion from fiscal year 2001 through fiscal year 2011, according to the Congressional Research Service.
 Number of times Obama has visited Afghanistan: 3 as president, including Tuesday, and 1 as a presidential candidate.

“Hundreds Demonstrate over Civilian Casualties, Blame NATO” (TOLOnews.com) May 1, 2012, http://tolonews.com/afghanistan/6073-hundreds-demonstrate-over-civilian-casualties-blame-nato-?lang=en

May 1, 2012, http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2012/may/01/us-us-afghanistan-by-the-numbers/

“Deadly Afghan-NATO raid sparks protests — one of her sons came out and the American forces shot him and killed him. Then her other son came out, and they killed him,”
http://www.rawa.org/temp/runews/2012/05/01/deadly-afghan-nato-raid-sparks-protests.html


ICasualties notes

IED Fatalities

Period
IED
Total
Pct
2001
0
4
0.00
2002
4
25
16.00
2003
3
26
11.54
2004
12
27
44.44
2005
20
73
27.40
2006
41
130
31.54
2007
78
184
42.39
2008
152
263
57.79
2009
275
451
60.98
2010
368
630
58.41
2011
252
492
51.22
2012
45
91
49.45


U.S. Fatalities in and around Afghanistan
Country of Death
Fatalities
Afghanistan
1792
Bahrain
1
Germany (from wounds in theatre)
27
Indonesia
1
Kuwait
1
Pakistan
15
Qatar
1
Southwest Asia
1
USA (from wounds in theatre)
30
Uzbekistan
1
Total
1870


Coalition Military Fatalities By Year
Year
US
UK
Other
Total
2001
12
0
0
12
2002
49
3
18
70
2003
48
0
10
58
2004
52
1
7
60
2005
99
1
31
131
2006
98
39
54
191
2007
117
42
73
232
2008
155
51
89
295
2009
317
108
96
521
2010
499
103
109
711
2011
418
46
102
566
2012
95
18
30
143
Total
1959
412
619
2990
http://icasualties.org/oef/

Pakistan

Pakistan-based Ali Sukhanver is a bilingual analyst on national and international strategic and defense affairs.

“Ten suspected insurgents were killed in a U.S. drone strike in a house close to the Afghan border on Saturday, Pakistani officials told media,” May 5, 2012, TOLOnews.com

“Pakistan condemns U.S. drone attack in North Waziristan, May 5, 2012, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/239761.html

Waziristan

Wazīristān tract was under British political administration beginning in 1892 and it was the scene of several large-scale British military operations against the tribes from the late 1800s until Pakistani independence in 1947.

Bounded on the west by Afghanistan, Waziristan is a geographic region of Pakistan’s North-West Frontier Province. This is a barren, mountainous country occupied by part of the Sulaimān Range and bounded north by the Kurram River and the south by the Gumal River.

The Pashtun inhabitants of Wazīristān are divided into two principal groups, the Darwish (or Wazīr), the main tribe in the north; and the Maḥsūd, the dominant tribe in the south.

“U.S. defends drone attacks despite civilian deaths — The United States has defended its assassination drone strikes in several countries despite the deaths of a large number of civilians,” April 30, 2012,  http://www.presstv.ir/detail/238859.html

“Drone summit in Washington highlights the aircraft expanding use to discuss the growing use of the unmanned aircraft by the U.S. in surveillance as well as targeted killing operations carried out in foreign countries,” (Press TV reports), http://www.presstv.ir/detail/238651.html

“U.S. Drone Kills 10 in Pakistan,” May 5, 2012,
http://tolonews.com/en/afghanistan/6118-us-drone-kills-10-in-pakistan



Images

Afghan image caption-RAWA

Disbelief: Two grief-stricken Afghan men look into the van where the body of a badly burned child lays, wrapped in a blue blanket. 17 innocent civilians were massacred by US soldiers on March 11, 2012 in Kandahar, Afghanistan. (Photo: EPA)

http://www.rawa.org/temp/runews/2012/04/22/us-atrocities-in-afghanistan.html#ixzz1u1RAALvk
Status of forces agreement Iraq, http://www.blackcommentator.com/284/issue_284.html
http://www.setyoufreenews.com/2011/06/25/permanent-us-iraq-and-afghanistan-occupations-planned/
___________________________________



Bennett's books are available in New York State independent bookstores: Lift Bridge Bookshop: www.liftbridgebooks.com [Brockport, NY]; Sundance Books: http://www.sundancebooks.com/main.html [Geneseo, NY]; Mood Makers Books: www.moodmakersbooks.com [City of Rochester, NY]; Dog Ears Bookstore and Literary Arts Center: www.enlightenthedog.org/ [Buffalo, NY]; Burlingham Books – ‘Your Local Chapter’: http://burlinghambooks.com/ [Perry, NY 14530]; The Bookworm: http://www.eabookworm.com/ [East Aurora, NY] • See also: World Pulse: Global Issues through the eyes of Women: http://www.worldpulse.com/ http://www.worldpulse.com/pulsewire http://www.facebook.com/#!/bennetts2ndstudy

___________________________________