Welcome to Bennett's Study

From the Author of No Land an Island and Unconscionable

Pondering Alphabetic SOLUTIONS: Peace, Politics, Public Affairs, People Relations

http://www.bennettponderingpeacepoliticssolutions.com/

http://www.bennettponderingpeacepoliticssolutions.com/author/

http://www.bennettponderingpeacepoliticssolutions.com/buy/

UNCONSCIONABLE: http://www.unconscionableusforeignrelations.com/ http://www.unconscionableusforeignrelations.com/author/ http://www.unconscionableusforeignrelations.com/book/ http://www.unconscionableusforeignrelations.com/excerpt/ http://www.unconscionableusforeignrelations.com/contact/ http://www.unconscionableusforeignrelations.com/buy/ SearchTerm=Carolyn+LaDelle+Bennett http://www2.xlibris.com/books/webimages/wd/113472/buy.htm http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/08UNCONSCIONABLE/prweb12131656.htm http://bookstore.xlibris.com/AdvancedSearch/Default.aspx? http://bookstore.xlibris.com/Products/SKU-000757788/UNCONSCIONABLE.aspx

http://todaysinsight.blogspot.com

Friday, February 8, 2013

Defend Constitution or license chains without Charter ─ NDAA problem


Executive Branch (Nixon-era) impeachable offenses: 
Repression at home Repression abroad
Re-reporting, editing by 
Carolyn Bennett 
I believe the balance between finality and justice has been properly strung. 
Personal liberty is too vital a thing to be subject to deprivation except in accordance with the highest possible standards of fairness and decency. 
The record of the federal judiciary in the area of criminal law enforcement both federal and state may be viewed as the most striking example of its greatest function: the protection of individual liberties against encroachments of government power. ─ Thurgood Marshall, rights lawyer and former U.S. Supreme Court Justice

U.S. democracy, a people mindlessly in agony

“There is a growing recognition,” activist Sara Flounders said, “that the U.S. government at every level is [doing] less and less for the people.” The government is involved in more and more cuts to domestic programs (every social program; privatizing schools, libraries, hospitals for private profit. “The combination of cutbacks and endless wars grows repression.”

The Congress of the United States is overwhelmingly, Flounders says, “an extension of the lobbying industry. It salutes the lobbying industry. [Lawmakers] know who pays the ticket, who has gotten them into office and to whom they are answerable ─ not to the average working person in the United States, but to big corporate power at every level: the major pharmaceutical industries and others.”

The there is no greater or more serious indication of growing repression in the United States than in the National Defense Authorization Act (the NDAA): the Executive and Legislative branches’ grave violations of  “civil rights and liberties.”  


Regress: assault on U.S. Constitution

As a law, Daniel Ellsberg said, the Defense Authorization Act “is unprecedented.” But in practice, he said, “It is a systematic assault on the Constitution of the United States in every aspect—in the aspects of illegal surveillance and in warrantless surveillance,” practices that 40 years ago, he recounted, factored into the impeachment of former U.S. President Richard Nixon.

 “As a former civilian official” in the 1970s, Ellsberg said, “I released 7,000 pages of top-secret documents demonstrating lies, crimes, treaty violations by the U.S. government that had lied us into a wrongful and hopeless war; [and in the course of that war, the government] was killing Americans and others in large numbers.” For releasing those documents, Ellsberg “was facing 115 years in prison” (just as Bradley Manning now faces life charges) based on “illegal surveillance, warrantless surveillance, the use of the CIA against me ─ now legalized under the USA PATRIOT Act; and a hit squad now allegedly legalized by the current president but which had  figured into impeachment proceedings against President Nixon.”
  
Writing at al Jazeera last August one of the plaintiffs in the case against the Obama administration said “The U.S. government seems determined to have the power to do away with due process and Americans’ right to a trial.”

 Executive and Judicial imbalance, conflict

“I am one of the lead plaintiffs in the civil lawsuit against the National Defense Authorization Act, which gives the president the power to hold any U.S. citizen anywhere for as long as he wants, without charge or trial,” Jennifer (Tangerine) Bolen reported. “In May, following a March hearing in which U.S. lawyers had said the president has the power to lock up journalists, war correspondents, peaceful activists and other plaintiffs indefinitely under the NDAA,  Judge Katherine Forrest [U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York] issued an injunction against the practice.”

At the time Bolen was writing, there was a final hearing in New York City in which “U.S. government lawyers essentially asserted even more extreme powers: the power to entirely disregard the judge and the law. Indeed,” Bolen wrote, “[President] Obama’s lawyers filed an appeal to the injunction, a profoundly important development” that was scarcely reported in the press.

Excessive Executive powers, unlawful, capricious action

The government also refused to define what it means to be an ‘associated force,’ and it claimed the right to refrain from offering any clear definition of this term, or clear boundaries of power under this law.

The hearing in August, Bolen said, “was even more terrifying” in that President Obama’s attorneys refused under questioning to assure the court that ─ after Judge Forrest’s injunction ─ the NDAA’s provision, one permitting detention without trial of reporters and others who have not committed crimes, had not been applied by the U.S. government anywhere in the world.

“In other words,” Bolen explained, the Executive Branch “was saying to a U.S. judge that they could not or would not state whether the Obama government had complied” with the court’s ruling. In response Judge Forrest said if the enjoined provision had been applied, “the United States government itself will be in contempt of court.”

Repression: at home, abroad
Domestic policy is foreign relations practice

Repression at home goes hand in hand with an ever-expanding military machine, Sara Flounders said. The very policies that are implemented around the world─

Secret prisons,
U.S. asserting 'rights' to invade, occupy other countries
To establish military bases around the world
To fire drone attacks on any country
To assassinate anyone [the U.S. government considers or declares] a threat even if they know nothing about the person or the town or the village that is being attacked.

All of that comes home, she said. “What happens internationally gets reflected domestically. The prison system domestically is what is carried abroad in attacks on people around the world.”

B
y early February, according to news sources, more than “60,000 emails” had been sent to the U.S. Congress calling for the reversal of section 1021 of the NDAA ─ notably its vague language that leaves many people including journalists, war correspondents, out-spoken activists in danger of harm, losing fundamental rights guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution. 

Defend U.S. Constitution or 
license chains sans Charter

“We are trying to get people across the country to stand with us,” Tangerine Bolen said, “because this is the thin line between the last of our most fundamental civil liberties.” The National Defense Authorization Act “rolls back our rights” to the days before the Magna Carta.  “We have had due process for 800 years. It is fundamental,” she said.

M
agna Carta: Charter of English liberties granted under King John in 1215 and reissued with changes in 1216, 1217, 1225): Early in its history, Magna Carta became a symbol and a battle cry against oppression, each successive generation reading into it a protection of its own threatened liberties.

In England the Petition of Right (1628) and the Habeas Corpus Act (1679) looked directly back to clause 39 of the charter of 1215, which stated that ‘no free man shall be…imprisoned or disseised [dispossessed]…except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.’
 
In the United States, both the national and the state constitutions show ideas and phrases directly traceable to Magna Carta. But 


O
ur Constitution has been under assault, mostly covertly, for 10 years,” Daniel Ellsberg said this week on the Democracy Now program.

At first, they simply lied [about what] they were doing, said they weren’t torturing anybody, weren’t sending anybody to rendition; now they are openly proclaiming it.

They have laid down the … challenge to the American public as a whole

[And] the time has come to defend the Constitution and try to restore its guarantees to the American people.




Sources and notes

“U.S. turns ‘war on terror’ on Americans: Sara Flounders,” February 2, 2013,
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/02/02/286864/war-on-terror-now-hits-americans/

“Lawsuit filed against Obama over controversial NDAA program,” February 7, 2013,
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/02/07/287702/lawsuit-filed-against-obama-over-controversial-ndaa-program/

On December 31, 2011, President Obama signed into law the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (NDAA) a bill passed each year. Section 1021 of the bill provides sweeping powers of detention through vague and undefined terms Critics say it grants the government to arrest any American citizen (or anyone, anywhere) without warrant and to indefinitely detain them without any charge.

On October 2, 2012, a stay against the permanent injunction was granted by a three judge motions panel of the Second District U.S. Court of Appeals, pending appeal on the merits.

At the time of this article, according to reports, more than “60,000 emails” had been sent to the U.S. Congress calling for the reversal of section 1021 of the NDAA ─ notably its vague language that leaves many people including journalists, war correspondents, out-spoken activists in danger of harm, losing fundamental rights guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution. 

“NY rally protests unconstitutionality of U.S. Defense Authorization Act,” February 7, 2013, http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/02/07/287738/us-rally-slams-ndaa-as-unconstitutional/

“Daniel Ellsberg: NDAA Indefinite Detention Provision is Part of ‘Systematic Assault on Constitution’” Democracy Now reporting (interview), Tuesday, February 5, 2013,
http://www.democracynow.org/2013/2/5/daniel_ellsberg_ndaa_indefinite_detention_provision#transcript

“Justice Dept. Argues Appeal of NDAA Ruling” Democracy Now headlines February 7, 2013, http://www.democracynow.org/2013/2/7/headlines#272

“The ability of the U.S. government to jail people without charge or trial is back in court.

“A group of reporters, scholars and activists … are suing the Obama administration over the controversial provision in the National Defense Authorization Act, saying it could allow for the indefinite detention of journalists and others who interact with certain groups.

“On Wednesday, the Justice Department asked an appeals court to reverse a judge’s earlier decision blocking indefinite detention, saying the ruling would hamper its ability to fight terrorism.

“The Obama administration has already won an emergency freeze of the ruling while the case is appealed. Plaintiffs Tangerine Bolen and Daniel Ellsberg, the Pentagon whistleblower, spoke outside the courthouse on Wednesday.”

“Due process under duress: Detaining citizens under NDAA ─ Activists retaliate against the U.S. government by suing them for signing a bill they say goes against the Constitution,  Jennifer (Tangerine) Bolen at, Al Jazeera August 23, 2012, http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/profile/tangerine-bolen.html

Tangerine Bolen

Jennifer (Tangerine) Bolen is the founder and Executive Director of RevolutionTruth, an organization dedicated to restoring legitimate democracies in part through increasing access to accurate information. Bolen has background in integrative medicine and holds a Master’s degree in Public Health and Policy. She has also completed core coursework for a doctorate in public affairs and governance.

Sara Flounders

Co-Director of the International Action Center, an organization opposing U.S. militarism, corporate globalization, racism and war, Sara Flounders currently works with the Troops Out Now Coalition.

The IAC helped to form the broad-based U.S. anti-war coalitions that coordinated the major anti-war demonstrations that drew hundreds of thousands of people into the streets in 2003 before the U.S. invasion of Iraq and in the years of occupation.

Flounders has represented the IAC while speaking on numerous campus and community forums in the United States, Canada, England, Japan, Greece, Cuba, Egypt, Jordan and other countries; and has been interviewed by many national and international print and broadcast media outlets.

She has traveled to Iraq, Yugoslavia, Sudan and Colombia when these countries were under U.S. attack and to Palestine twice during the current Intifada. In 1992, Flounders coordinated the International War Crimes Tribunal on U.S. War Crimes in Iraq, which held mass hearings in 30 U.S. cities and 20 countries. She coordinated research and helped to edit Ramsey Clark’s groundbreaking 1992 book, The Fire This Time: U.S. War Crimes in the Gulf.

To expose the use of sanctions as a weapon of mass destruction, Sara Flounders edited and co-authored two books: The Children Are Dying - The Impact of Sanctions on Iraq (1996, Second Edition, 1998) and Challenge to Genocide: Let Iraq Live (1998). She helped produce the videos: “Blockade - The Silent War against Iraq” (1994), “Genocide by Sanctions” (1998, award winner) and “Let Iraq Live” (1998). As a coordinator of the Iraq Sanctions Challenge, she organized large delegations of activists to visit Iraq each year in a challenge to the U.S. sanctions laws and has brought tons of medicine to the Iraqi people on each of these trips.

The International Action Center (IAC), initiated by former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark, combines grassroots activism with mass mobilizations and protest activities. Its educational work includes producing fact sheets and press releases, publishing books, producing documentary videos and maintaining a website. http://www.iacenter.org/flounders.htm

Daniel Ellsberg

Daniel Ellsberg (b. April 7, 1931) is a former United States military analyst who, while employed by the RAND Corporation, precipitated a national political controversy in 1971 when he released to The New York Times and other newspapers the “Pentagon Papers,” a top-secret Pentagon study of U.S. government decision-making related to the Vietnam War.

RAND Corporation (Research ANd Development) is a nonprofit global policy think tank originally formed by Douglas Aircraft Company to offer research and analysis to the United States armed forces. It is currently financed by the U.S. government and private endowment, corporations, including the healthcare industry, universities and private individuals.

This organization’s work reaches farther in working with other governments, private foundations, international organizations, and commercial organizations on a variety of non-defense issues. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAND_Corporation

Since the end of the Vietnam War, “Ellsberg has been a lecturer, writer and activist on the dangers of the nuclear era, wrongful U.S. interventions and the urgent need for patriotic whistleblowing.”

Ellsberg’s latest books are Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers (2002) and Risk, Ambiguity and Decision (2001). In 2006 recognized “for putting peace and truth first at considerable personal risk and dedicating his life to inspiring others to follow his example,” he was awarded a Right Livelihood Award.

See Ellsberg’s bio continued at Today’s Insight News, Tuesday, August 7, 2012
“Americans’ Hiroshima: wrong is right, a ‘dangerous state of mind’”
Also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Ellsberg
http://www.ellsberg.net/bio
http://www.ellsberg.net/archive/hiroshima-day-america-has-been-asleep-at-the-wheel-for-64-years

Magna Carta

Charter of English liberties granted under King John in 1215 and reissued with changes in 1216, 1217, 1225): Early in its history, Magna Carta became a symbol and a battle cry against oppression, each successive generation reading into it a protection of its own threatened liberties.

In England the Petition of Right (1628) and the Habeas Corpus Act (1679) looked directly back to clause 39 of the charter of 1215, which stated that ‘no free man shall be…imprisoned or disseised [dispossessed]…except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.’

In the United States, both the national and the state constitutions show ideas and phrases directly traceable to Magna Carta. [Britannica note]


Thurgood Marshall (July 2, 1908 – January 24, 1993), Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court (October 1967 - October 1991. The High Court’s 96th justice, its first African-American justice. (Wikipedia note, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thurgood_Marshall)

Quote and image, http://www.wnyc.org/articles/wnyc-news/2008/jul/08/naacp-historical-audio-files/


___________________________________

Bennett's books are available in New York State independent bookstores: Lift Bridge Bookshop: www.liftbridgebooks.com [Brockport, NY]; Sundance Books: http://www.sundancebooks.com/main.html [Geneseo, NY]; Mood Makers Books: www.moodmakersbooks.com [City of Rochester, NY]; Dog Ears Bookstore and Literary Arts Center: www.enlightenthedog.org/ [Buffalo, NY]; Burlingham Books – ‘Your Local Chapter’: http://burlinghambooks.com/ [Perry, NY 14530]; The Bookworm: http://www.eabookworm.com/ [East Aurora, NY] • See also: World Pulse: Global Issues through the eyes of Women: http://www.worldpulse.com/ http://www.worldpulse.com/pulsewire http://www.facebook.com/#!/bennetts2ndstudy

___________________________________

No comments:

Post a Comment