Welcome to Bennett's Study

From the Author of No Land an Island and Unconscionable

Pondering Alphabetic SOLUTIONS: Peace, Politics, Public Affairs, People Relations

http://www.bennettponderingpeacepoliticssolutions.com/

http://www.bennettponderingpeacepoliticssolutions.com/author/

http://www.bennettponderingpeacepoliticssolutions.com/buy/

UNCONSCIONABLE: http://www.unconscionableusforeignrelations.com/ http://www.unconscionableusforeignrelations.com/author/ http://www.unconscionableusforeignrelations.com/book/ http://www.unconscionableusforeignrelations.com/excerpt/ http://www.unconscionableusforeignrelations.com/contact/ http://www.unconscionableusforeignrelations.com/buy/ SearchTerm=Carolyn+LaDelle+Bennett http://www2.xlibris.com/books/webimages/wd/113472/buy.htm http://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/08UNCONSCIONABLE/prweb12131656.htm http://bookstore.xlibris.com/AdvancedSearch/Default.aspx? http://bookstore.xlibris.com/Products/SKU-000757788/UNCONSCIONABLE.aspx

http://todaysinsight.blogspot.com

Showing posts with label BREAKDOWN USA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BREAKDOWN USA. Show all posts

Sunday, July 7, 2013

Community counter punches cabal’s disestablishment tactics: CHICAGO

Chicago
 EDUCATION meets SOCIETY: workers, community champion public good
Excerpt, editing by Carolyn Bennett

“Rebirth of Chicago Teachers Union, Possibilities for a Counter-Hegemonic Education Movement” by Eric (Rico) Gutstein and Pauline Lipman

Philadelphia, Pa
USA
The authors of this essay are activists and scholars. Lipman writes and teaches about the political economy and racial politics of urban education.  Gutstein writes and teaches about critical pedagogy, education for social justice, and mathematics education policy. Both are active members of the grassroots organization Teachers for Social Justice (TSJ) in Chicago and have participated in education organizing against school closings and education privatization since 2004. Through TSJ, the authors were involved in building support for the Chicago teachers’ strike as part of a broad coalition of parents, community members, and educators. This is an edited excerpt from their essay.
Chicago

Predators at America’s jugular: 
its young, its community, its workers

I
n a version of disaster capitalism reminiscent of post-Katrina New Orleans, the 2008 economic crisis was a golden opportunity to accelerate education privatization at all levels, weaken unions, and further streamline schooling for global competitiveness.

This was the thrust of the Obama administration’s $4.3 billion economic recovery initiative for education, known as ‘Race to the Top.’ The ensuing ‘fiscal crisis’ of the state provides a warrant to close public schools, expand privately run charter schools, and dismantle whole school districts (e.g., Detroit), or replace them with a ‘portfolio’ of education providers (e.g., Philadelphia).

Not educators, profiteers: Gateses, Waltons: Billionaire venture philanthropists, such as the (Bill and Melinda) Gates Foundation and the Walton (Wal-mart) Foundation, are deploying their enormous wealth to steer federal and state policy and local school districts in this direction. At a moment when public schools face severe budget cuts, “in state after state, (mostly) men … with vast personal fortunes invest in campaigns to end teachers’ tenure, end seniority…and clear the way for private takeovers of public schools, where teachers work with no job rights at all.” The focus is urban school districts where African-American communities have borne the brunt of school closings.

This neoliberal class project exemplifies ‘accumulation by dispossession’—commandeering public goods for private accumulation—whether through opening the Amazon rain forest to cattle ranching, privatizing water in Bolivia, or privatizing public housing, roads, bridges, and schools in the United States.

It is in the context of this drive-by investors to appropriate public goods—and the related displacement, dislocation, and robbery of the vast majority—that the global neoliberal assault on teaching, teachers, and their unions needs to be understood.

C
hicago teachers stood up to this agenda (and) …the significance of their strike should be viewed in relation to the global agenda to restructure public education for economic competitiveness and capital accumulation.

In the United States, this agenda ─ a bipartisan agenda ─ began with the Reagan (Ronald Wilson Reagan, 40th president of the United States,1981–1989,  born in Tampico, Illinois, died in Los Angeles, California)  administration’s call to hold teachers and schools accountable for results and to run schools like businesses.

In more than twenty-five years various sectors of capital and corporate “education ‘reformers’” have pushed a national system of top-down accountability driven by high-stakes standardized tests, national standards, teacher evaluation tied to test scores, mayoral control of schools, and privatization. In the second decade of the 2000s the public counterpunched.  

Isolationism and regress to possibility and progress

A convergence of social forces and unfolding crises has created an opening for a counter-hegemonic education movement in Chicago.

The economic crisis, the accumulated effects of neoliberal education policies, the acceleration of school closings, the illegitimacy of mayoral control, the persistence and maturation of the education-justice struggles in black and Latina/o communities, and the rebirth of the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) created conditions for new alliances and new possibilities to contest the dominant education agenda. This new moment was crystallized in the Chicago teachers’ strike. 

2010 Illinois ‘fiscal crisis’: Chicago Public Schools (CPS) had threatened broad cuts to music and art, increases in class sizes ─ even in affluent neighborhoods; and middle-class parents, a key constituency that Chicago’s mayors had worked to recruit to public schools and whose neighborhoods had experienced no school closings, were alarmed. They formed a new organization to lobby against the cuts.

2011: Newly elected Mayor Emanuel had launched a crusade for a longer school day (same as pre- Emanuel, interminable-day approach to improving schools with no additional resources) as a quick-fix education reform. Parents across the city got angry; white working-class communities were galvanized. Parents previously uninvolved in education struggles began protesting school board policies and in the process encountered black and Latina/o parents who were fighting school closings and charter expansion.

2012 Solidarity: groups of mainly white parents and African-American and Latina/o organizations fighting school closings and education-justice organizations formed a cross-city campaign for an elected representative school board in Chicago.
 

T
he CTU strike, the elected school-board campaign, and growing alliances demonstrate new possibilities.


The Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) strike changed the education landscape, locally and nationally.

It showed that teachers’ unions in partnership with the community can stand up to the neoliberal assault on public education.

It showed the power of social movement unionism born in part of community education struggles also enlivens those struggles.

It demonstrated the possibility of imagining a counter-hegemonic formation that pushes forward an agenda for education justice that spreads beyond schools to stake a claim for the right to the city.
 
Broad Public Solidarity: community, workers, public interest conjoined

“The significance of the Chicago teachers’, strike, the educators write, “has to be understood in relation to the broad attack on the public sector.

Local governments insist that there is no alternative to address the ‘fiscal crisis’ and press for austerity budgets that cut deep into what remains of the social-safety net and decent public-sector jobs. 

City governments are cutting police and firefighters, slashing public employees’ wages and benefits, closing libraries and schools, foregoing infrastructure repairs and maintenance, and selling off public infrastructure to consortia of transnational investors.


Chicago
This is a class strategy to shift the cost of the crises of financialization, speculative real estate investment, and corporate profiteering run amuck onto working class and poor people, especially people of color and middle-income earners; and to support capital accumulation in the context of lack of ‘profitable’ outlets for investment.

T
Public Sector rally
Civil Servants
Greece
eachers and other public-sector workers are ultimately responsible to the families and communities they serve and their working conditions are tied to the funding and quality of public institutions. This calls on unions to emphasize the connection between the well-being of workers and the well-being of communities and to build principled union-community alliances.
 
The broad-based attacks on teachers and teachers’ unions create conditions for a new teachers’ union politics that breaks with the business unionism that has failed miserably to defend workers and the public interest.



Sources and notes

“The Rebirth of the Chicago Teachers Union and Possibilities for a Counter-Hegemonic Education Movement” by Eric (Rico) Gutstein and Pauline Lipman (Introduction), http://monthlyreview.org/2013/06/01/the-rebirth-of-the-chicago-teachers-union-and-possibilities-for-a-counter-hegemonic-education-movement

Article examining interrelationship of community education struggles and the emergence of the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) as a social movement union; and concluding with possibilities for a counter-hegemonic education movement in Chicago:

“For nine days in September, Chicago belonged to the teachers, school paraprofessionals, and clinicians. On September 10, 2012, 26,000 members of the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) went on strike. It was the first teachers’ strike in Chicago in twenty-five years. While public and private sector unions have taken concessions and capitulated to cuts in wages, benefits, seniority rights, job protections, and much of what was won by the labor movement in the twentieth century, the CTU stood up to Mayor Rahm Emanuel, the Commercial Club of Chicago, and the billionaire hedge-fund managers who have set out to break teachers’ unions and dismantle public education. Chicago was a sea of CTU red.

“Teachers—and their parent, student, and community supporters—picketed at schools across the city, marched through neighborhood streets, and brought downtown Chicago to a standstill with mass rallies of thousands, day after day. There was no need to defend school entrances against scabs—there were none!”

Authors of essay

Eric (Rico) Gutstein is a professor in Curriculum and Instruction at the University of Illinois-Chicago and is active in the movement against education privatization. He is author of Reading and Writing the World with Mathematics: Toward a Pedagogy for Social Justice (2006), and co-editor of Rethinking Mathematics: Teaching Social Justice by the Numbers, 2nd ed. (2013).


Pauline Lipman is Professor of Educational Policy Studies at University of Illinois-Chicago, Director of the Collaborative for Equity and Justice in Education, and an education activist in Chicago. She is author of The New Political Economy of Urban Education: Neoliberalism, Race, and the Right to the City.


_________________________________________________

Bennett's books are available in New York State independent bookstores: Lift Bridge Bookshop: www.liftbridgebooks.com [Brockport, NY]; Sundance Books: http://www.sundancebooks.com/main.html [Geneseo, NY]; Mood Makers Books: www.moodmakersbooks.com [City of Rochester, NY]; Dog Ears Bookstore and Literary Arts Center: www.enlightenthedog.org/ [Buffalo, NY]; Burlingham Books – ‘Your Local Chapter’: http://burlinghambooks.com/ [Perry, NY 14530]; The Bookworm: http://www.eabookworm.com/ [East Aurora, NY] • See also: World Pulse: Global Issues through the eyes of Women: http://www.worldpulse.com/ http://www.worldpulse.com/pulsewire http://www.facebook.com/#!/bennetts2ndstudy

_________________________________________________

Monday, July 1, 2013

European “friends” react to U.S. government’s unfriendly fire

With “friends” like these ─ who needs…?
Edited excerpt, commentary by Carolyn Bennett

The U.S. government for the longest time has been using electronic hacking measures to infiltrate the personal, professional, business and international affairs of individual and nations ─ from the United States to Europe to Asia to Africa; and that is only as much as we know today.

Under the regime holding unchecked power in Washington:
Anybody is subject to attack. Anyone can be a victim. Anybody can be a convenient “terrorist”; anybody an “enemy” ─ including peoples and nations traditionally believed to be actual friends of the United States of America.

Corrupt, inept politics makes expedient friends and expedient enemies. Such leadership of a single nation ─ let alone a presumptive or self-proclaimed leader of the world, even of the Western world ─ is worst than outrageous. In my view, it is criminal and, in order to end the lawlessness and the insidious breakdown of human rights conventions, these leaders must be called to account before an independent court of justice.

Some leaders in Europe seem also to be outraged, as indicated by today’s article in Spiegel Online: “‘No Longer in the Cold War’ ─ (German Chancellor Angela) Merkel Infuriated by U.S. Spying”

Dr. Angela Merkel
Chancellor, Germany
 German Chancellor Angela Merkel (through her representative):  

‘We are no longer in the Cold War’ [Merkel had already communicated her displeasure to the U.S]….

‘The monitoring of friends … is unacceptable [and] can’t be tolerated.…

‘Trust has to be the basis of our cooperation.… When it comes to this affair, trust has to be re-established.’

Chancellor Angela Merkel
German Economy Minister Philipp Rösler (vice chancellor to Merkel): 


‘The energetic collection of data [by] … our partners in [the] European [Union] and abroad is outrageous.

‘We have understanding for combating terrorism’ … but not for ‘aimless, indiscriminate and unrestrained spying on citizens.’

German Consumer Affairs Minister Ilse Aigner:

‘We need better protection of private data; not more state surveillance. Otherwise, a free trade agreement makes no sense.’

European Parliament President Martin Schulz

‘As a European and a representative of a European institution, I feel treated like the representative of the enemy.

‘Is this the basis for a constructive relationship ...? I think not.’

European Commission President José Manuel Barroso (his representative)

‘We expect rapid clarification from our American partners. … Of course we are worried because, if the allegations are true, it would create a great deal of unrest.’

EU diplomats with involvement of German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle and in consultative agreement with EU Foreign Affairs Chief Catherine Ashton (statement from the Foreign Ministry in Berlin):


‘…Such activity among partners and friends is unacceptable.’

President François Hollande (France):

‘We cannot accept this kind of behavior between partners and allies. …We ask that this stop immediately. [U.S. surveillance and spying activities also targeted Paris]

President Giorgio Napolitano (Italy):

‘This is a touchy issue that requires satisfactory answers.’

  
U.S. carnage on human rights
─ from Seoul to Damascus, Tripoli to Paris, Islamabad to Berlin; and one after another but really the same ole regime keeps up a mantra to the people: “They” just don’t like us because we’re so wonderful, with our “freedoms” and all. Well, you can believe this if you choose or you can vote them out or recall them or haul the whole lot of them before an independent tribunal (or do all of these).

Politics and government officials as rotten as these, as inept, as arrogant can be neither retrofitted nor rehabilitated. In my opinion, they must be uprooted, all of them, without exception or fear or favor. Americans’ romantic affair with partisans and tribes, mere color and political and or ideological spectrum must be ended; or this nation will come undone, entirely. Instead of progressing, it will continue its downward spiral, its regress, its BREAKDOWN.




Source

“‘No Longer in the Cold War’ ─ Merkel Infuriated by U.S. Spying,” July 1, 2013 [© SPIEGEL ONLINE 2013  All Rights Reserved

 Reproduction only allowed with the permission of SPIEGELnet GmbH], 
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/merkel-furious-at-us-spying-and-eu-to-check-offices-for-bugs-a-908859.html

_____________________________________________

Bennett's books are available in New York State independent bookstores: Lift Bridge Bookshop: www.liftbridgebooks.com [Brockport, NY]; Sundance Books: http://www.sundancebooks.com/main.html [Geneseo, NY]; Mood Makers Books: www.moodmakersbooks.com [City of Rochester, NY]; Dog Ears Bookstore and Literary Arts Center: www.enlightenthedog.org/ [Buffalo, NY]; Burlingham Books – ‘Your Local Chapter’: http://burlinghambooks.com/ [Perry, NY 14530]; The Bookworm: http://www.eabookworm.com/ [East Aurora, NY] • See also: World Pulse: Global Issues through the eyes of Women: http://www.worldpulse.com/ http://www.worldpulse.com/pulsewire http://www.facebook.com/#!/bennetts2ndstudy

_____________________________________________

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

“Democracy” of whim ─ dependent on The State’s defense of wealth, privilege

“Liberal advocates of a police state turn savagely against Edward Snowden” penned late last week by David North and Eric London at WSWS
Edited excerpt by Carolyn Bennett

The rich and the privileged hate Edward Snowden,” North and London write, “because (Snowden) has defied the state that protects their interests.”

Snowden “failed to show proper deference to their system and their secrets.”

Snowden “has exposed the massive conspiracy that is being directed in Washington against the democratic rights of the people.

“That is why they are determined to destroy Edward Snowden.

“It is the solemn duty of the working class to come to Snowden’s defense.”

Whimsical advocates of constitutional law, “democracy”

Media argue: Even if the actions of the government were illegal and violated the constitutional rights of the American people, so argues the media, Snowden owed the government total and unquestioned obedience.

The loyalty Edward Snowd
en owed the state outweighed whatever moral and political obligations he felt to inform his fellow citizens of the government’s subversion of democracy

University of Chicago Professor Geoffrey R. Stone, 2004: ‘One of the important lessons is that if American citizens want to have the freedoms that are guaranteed to them, they cannot sit back passively and allow elected officials and judges to protect their rights for them.

‘It’s very important for the American people to recognize that if they want their freedoms—want their liberties—they have to take responsibility for preserving them in these times.’ [Perilous Times: Free Speech in War Time from the Sedition Act of 1798 to the War on Terror]

Professor Stone, 2013 repudiates essential democratic principles

‘But what if the employee decides, in his own wisdom, that some classified information doesn’t need to be classified or that it would be good for the public to know the classified information? Should the employee be allowed to make that judgment?

‘Merely to state the question is to answer it.

‘There is no reason on earth why an individual government employee should have the authority, on his own say so, to override the judgment of the elected representatives of the American people and to decide for the nation that classified information should be disclosed to friends and enemies alike. Such an act is a complete usurpation of the rule of law.

To Stone’s earlier pronouncement, David North and Eric London respond that it is precisely “because Snowden did not ‘sit back passively’ but, instead, took responsibility for the defense of democratic rights that Stone,” in a convenient turnabout, “declares that Snowden ‘is most certainly a criminal who deserves serious punishment.’”

Stone’s argument, they continue, “is based on authoritarian premises that are not fundamentally different from those that prevailed in Nazi Germany. As German historian Ingo Müller wrote in Hitler’s Justice: The Courts of the Third Reich, the Nazi Supreme Court ‘defined the “legal nature” of the civil service as “loyalty, obedience, and conscientious performance of duty” and had referred to civil servants as “the political troops of the Führer in the area of administration.”’”

To Stone’s “no reason on earth” claim, North and London reply, “This is an astonishing declaration!
‘No reason on earth…’?
 “In other words, an employee of the state must keep his mouth shut and refrain from exposing criminal activity no matter how injurious it may be to the rights of the American people.
 ‘No reason on earth’!
 What if a civil servant uncovers a secret memorandum authorizing the assassination of a citizen? Or plans for the mass incarceration of political dissidents?
Law breaking is okay, exposing law breaking is a crime.


…“T
he essence of Stone’s argument is that Snowden, having accepted government employment, forfeited all right, let alone responsibility, to expose illegal actions by the government.

  
“…T
he breakdown of democratic institutions proceeds alongside the dissolution of any significant support for democratic rights within the ruling elite and its faithful retainers among the wealthiest 5 percent of the population.

“Aware of their distance from the social interests of the broad masses of the population, they look to the state to defend their own wealth and privileges.”



Sources and notes

“Liberal advocates of a police state turn savagely against Edward Snowden” (By David North and Eric London), June 14, 2013, http://wsws.org/en/articles/2013/06/14/comm-j14.html

The World Socialist Web Site and Socialist Equality Party are organizing a campaign in defense of Snowden and democratic rights.

Defend Edward Snowden and democratic rights!

The World Socialist Web Site and the Socialist Equality Party call on all workers, students and youth within the United States and internationally to come to the defense of Edward Snowden.

Snowden is the target of a massive government witch-hunt organized in response to his courageous exposure of secret and illegal surveillance programs targeting millions of people in the US and around the world. His defense is a matter of the greatest urgency.

Support must be built up in work places, at colleges and schools, and in working class neighborhoods. The defense of Snowden, Bradley Manning, Julian Assange and other targets of the U.S. government must become the spearhead for the development of a mass movement in defense of democratic rights.

The fight for democratic rights is inseparable from the development of a political movement of the American and international working class against the capitalist system, the source of war, social inequality and the drive toward dictatorship.

No time can be lost. Contact the Socialist Equality Party and become involved in the fight to defend Edward Snowden.

Contact information
 Mail:
 Socialist Equality Party,
 PO Box 48377, Oak Park, MI 48237
Phone: (313)-409-8083
http://socialequality.com/get_involved/get_involved

_______________________________________

Bennett's books are available in New York State independent bookstores: Lift Bridge Bookshop: www.liftbridgebooks.com [Brockport, NY]; Sundance Books: http://www.sundancebooks.com/main.html [Geneseo, NY]; Mood Makers Books: www.moodmakersbooks.com [City of Rochester, NY]; Dog Ears Bookstore and Literary Arts Center: www.enlightenthedog.org/ [Buffalo, NY]; Burlingham Books – ‘Your Local Chapter’: http://burlinghambooks.com/ [Perry, NY 14530]; The Bookworm: http://www.eabookworm.com/ [East Aurora, NY] • See also: World Pulse: Global Issues through the eyes of Women: http://www.worldpulse.com/ http://www.worldpulse.com/pulsewire http://www.facebook.com/#!/bennetts2ndstudy

_______________________________________

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Wars criminally callous amidst want: Misery manufactured, exacerbated, MADE IN USA

Sinister cycles: self-inflicted crises: endless aggression, endless suffering
Re-reporting, commentary by 
Carolyn Bennett

A
s  officials in the U.S. Executive and Legislative branches aided and abetted by the Judiciary commit one after another and simultaneous wars abroad and pressures and provokes sundry factions into more wars and conflict, they also continue to destroy the foundations, the promise and potential of the United States and its people.

Federal Washington robs children, America's future ─ all the while endorsing bought elections and  taking other kickbacks ─  to enrich industries of war, surveillance, torture, and incarceration.

Over the past five years, 14.3 percent or 42.7 million people in the United States of America languished at below-poverty-level incomes [2007-2011 American Community Survey].

Some groups showed poverty rates more than 10 percentage points worse than the national 14.3 percent poverty rate:

Native American Indian and Alaska Native (27.0 percent);

African (or black) - American (25.8 percent)

Hispanic-American: (23.2 percent), about nine percentage points higher than the overall U.S. poverty rate.

Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders showing rates above overall national average: (17.6 percent)

White- identified American poverty rates:  (11.6 percent)
Asian-identified American poverty rates: (11.7 percent)
(Both poverty rates lower than the overall poverty rate and not statistically differentiated from each other).

U.S. Asian population: poverty rates were higher for Vietnamese (14.7 percent) and Koreans (15.0 percent) and lower for Filipinos (5.8 percent)

U.S. Asians: nine states had poverty rates below 10 percent (Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maryland, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Virginia and South Carolina).

U.S. Hispanics: national poverty rates ranged from a low of 16.2 percent for Cubans to a high of 26.3 percent for Dominicans.

Particular Native American Poverty rates: American Indians and Alaska Natives (Rapid City, S.D.): (50.9 percent)

…around three times the rate in Anchorage, Alaska (16.6 percent), about 30 percent or greater in five other cities most populated by this group (Gallup, N.M.; Minneapolis; Rapid City, S.D.; Shiprock, N.M.; Tucson, Ariz.; and Zuni Pueblo, N.M.) [American Community Survey data collected from 2007 to 2011 by the U.S. Census Bureau.]

Nine states had poverty rates of about 30 percent or more for American Indians and Alaska Natives: Arizona, Maine, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota and Utah.

HUNGER affects all Americans but it slaughters some communities. This is brutal all round, for American and all peoples of the world. Yet Americans, while complaining and blaming, keep supporting the same, mostly corrupt creatures to lead from their ivory- towered/K-Street/DuPont Circle Federal Washington.

M
ore than one in seven Americans receives what’s not nearly enough yet what officials in Washington are trying to take away: help from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP. The one-in-seven percentage (15.2 percent) is comparable to the percentage of the American workforce affected by unemployment or underemployment (14.4 percent in January 2013), according to U.S. Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics U-6 Measure. 

Moreover, three in ten Americans are eligible but are never served by SNAP.

March 20113: SNAP national participation increased by 168,888 people over this month to

47,727,052 people

Rise from March 2012: 1.3 million people

Forty (40) U.S. states and the District of Columbia experienced increases in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (formerly named federal Food Stamp Program) caseloads between January 2012 and January 2013. The six states registering over-the-year percentage increases of eight percentage points or higher were Illinois, Wyoming, Hawaii, Florida, New Jersey, Louisiana.

The five states where SNAP was reportedly making huge differences in the economic well-being and health, the largest percentage-point difference in lifting households above 101 percent of the poverty level, were: New York (33.5), Vermont (26), Rhode Island (25.1), Massachusetts (23), and Alaska (19.4). [FRAC reported U.S. Census Bureau and USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service (FNS)]

The SNAP/Food Stamp Program is the largest nutrition assistance program administered by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Its goal: “to alleviate hunger and malnutrition … by increasing food purchasing power for all eligible households who apply for participation” as stated in the Food Stamp Act of 1977 as amended (P.L. 108-269).  The program provides monthly benefits to eligible low-income families, which can be used to purchase food. Through Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) systems replacing paper coupons, the use of a benefits card similar to a bank card, USDA reports, all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico now use EBT systems.

E
very 5 years, the SNAP/Food Stamp program is reauthorized by the U.S. Congress as part of the Farm Bill. Re-authorization establishes who is eligible for SNAP/Food Stamps and addresses
program access, benefit levels, and other matters.

Food Research and Action Center (FRAC) President Jim Weill said in a press release yesterday, “As the Farm Bill moves to the floor of the House of Representatives this week

Congress must acknowledge that any cut to SNAP means less food in the cupboards and refrigerators of the hungriest people in America – including children, seniors, working families, unemployed workers, and people with disabilities.…

Congresswoman Barbara Lee
Some Members of Congress initiated a “SNAP CHALLENGE.”

Nearly thirty members of the U.S. House of Representatives joined Congresswoman Barbara Lee in committing to living on the food budget of an average SNAP recipient: $4.50 a day to challenge a proposed $20 billion-cut to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) in the 2014 Farm Bill. Some Members made statements.

Congresswoman Barbara Lee (CA-13)
“The more than $20 billion in proposed cuts to SNAP are unconscionable and unacceptable. When I was a young, single mother, I was on public assistance, and I would not be where I am today if it weren’t for the vital lifeline that the American people extended to me. SNAP is the difference between food on the table and a child going to bed hungry. I’m so encouraged by all my colleagues who are joining me for the SNAP Challenge, and I encourage folks from across the country to get engaged and join the chorus voicing opposition to these outrageous cuts.” 

 Congressman Joseph Crowley (NY-14)
“As we consider the Farm Bill, Congress should be taking steps to strengthen the food stamp program, not destroy it. For millions of New Yorkers, this assistance means the difference between putting food on the table and going to bed hungry. I’ll be participating in the Food Stamp Challenge, keeping my spending on meals to under the average food stamp benefit, to highlight just how hard it is to stretch these dollars and how deeper cuts being proposed by the Republican majority will literally take food away from families.”

Congressman Jim McGovern (MA-2)  
“Cutting $20.5 billion from the SNAP program, as the House Farm Bill would do, is wrong-headed, mean-spirited and cruel.  I would hope that the members of the House who support those cuts would take the SNAP Challenge, and walk in the shoes – if only for a few days – of the Americans who struggle to feed their families.”

Congressman Sander Levin (MI-09)
“Far too many Americans continue to struggle just to feed themselves and their families. And yet House Republicans have proposed $20 billion in cuts to food stamps, which help the neediest among us. Participating in this challenge will provide me some insight into the struggle so many Americans face and I hope will highlight why we should not cut the program.”


Congressman Keith Ellison (MN-05)
“Food assistance fulfills a promise we make to each other: if you fall on hard times, your neighbors, friends, and fellow Americans will help you get a meal. These families live in our communities and their children are our kids’ classmates.  Nearly half of all Minnesotans who receive food assistance are children.  Eight in ten of them live below the poverty line, meaning they are from families. It's time we strengthened, not cut, food assistance.”

Congressman John Conyers (MI-13)
“My colleagues claim that these devastating cuts are needed to reduce the federal debt. However, every major deficit reduction package signed into law over the last thirty years has always been negotiated according to the principle of not increasing poverty or inequality.” 

 Congressman Marc Veasey (TX-33)
“According to the Center for Public Policy Priorities, Texas has the 9th highest food hardship rate in the country. This is why I support programs like SNAP which serves more than 1.6 million Texas households. The SNAP program provides a vital lifeline to combat childhood obesity, provides nutritious eating options for disadvantaged households, and ensures we eliminate the nation’s food deserts.”

Congressman Jared Huffman (CA-02)
“SNAP is a lifeline for millions of Americans families who cannot afford to eat without this modest assistance. That’s why the proposal by House Republican Leadership to slash funding for SNAP is so unconscionable.… We need Congress to understand what these cruel austerity measures mean on a personal level rather than a generic statistical sample, which is why I’m taking the SNAP Challenge next week and trying to live off of the average SNAP recipient’s $4.50 a day.”

Congresswoman Doris Matsui (CA-6)
 “Today almost 50 million Americans live with the insecurity of never knowing if they will be able to afford their next meal.  For these Americans, the SNAP program is a lifeline that ensures children have enough food to grow, that underpaid and underemployed workers have the means to feed their families, and that seniors don’t have to choose between food and medicine.  Incomprehensibly, House Republican leadership’s answer to these families is to propose a staggering $20 billion cut from the SNAP program.  Feeding a family on SNAP is difficult as it is, it would become virtually impossible if these cuts are implemented.  That is why I am taking the SNAP Challenge to promote awareness for hunger and highlight the importance of this critical program.” 

 Congressman Jim Langevin (RI-02)
“In the wealthiest nation in human history, it is unconscionable that every American cannot afford life’s basic necessities. I am proud join my colleagues participating in the SNAP challenge. Every member of Congress should know what it’s like to live on $4.50 per day, to know the pain of going to bed hungry, and to understand the full gravity of the decisions we make. When you take food off of the plates of hungry children, you have a moral obligation to understand the consequences.”

 Congressman Ted Deutch (FL-21)
“Despite our recent economic gains, many low-income and middle class families are still struggling to get by. At a time when hunger is on the rise, and nearly half of all Americans are living in poverty or just a paycheck away from it, the notion that nutritional assistance belongs on the chopping block is outrageous. The Food Stamp Challenge gives members of Congress the opportunity to experience for themselves the reality that SNAP is not an overly extravagant program, but a modest safeguard that protects millions of Americans from hunger.”

Congressman Mark Pocan (WI-2)
“Sometimes the best way to understand another person’s challenges is to spend some time walking in their shoes. While I will live on $4.50 a day for seven days, we cannot forget that millions of families survive on this and less every day, every week, for months at a time.… For these Americans, millions of whom are children, SNAP is an indispensable lifeline. We need to protect this critical program from the Republicans’ reckless cuts that would leave millions without adequate resources to feed themselves and their families.”

Congressman Dan Kildee (MI-05)
“With these deep cuts to nutrition programs being proposed, it’s important for elected officials to recognize the hardship millions of Americans face every day as they attempt to feed their families.  By living off such a limited budget, I hope to gain a better understanding of how difficult it is for many of my constituents to avoid hunger and try to meet nutritional needs.”

Congresswoman Robin Kelly (IL-02)
“As a longtime supporter of food pantries and hunger prevention, I am outraged by the proposed $20 billion cut to SNAP. This cut would be devastating to the more than 2 million Illinois residents who rely on SNAP benefits just to put food on the table.  I am participating in the challenge to stand in solidarity with my constituents who depend on SNAP and to call attention to the need to fight these irresponsible cuts.”

Congresswoman Michelle Lujan Grisham (NM-1)
“I’m humbled to be joining so many of my colleagues in the SNAP challenge. The SNAP program provides crucial support to families in New Mexico and across the country who continue to struggle to make ends meet. … Even with SNAP benefits, it’s a challenge to satisfy the nutritional needs of an individual or a family. But without these benefits, just getting by would be absolutely impossible for the one in five New Mexicans who rely on SNAP for basic nutrition and economic security. Although it’s going to be difficult to eat on just $4.50 a day, I cannot imagine what life must be like for families who have to go through this exercise week after week or even month after month.”

Congressman Hank Johnson (GA-04)
“I think a lot of people have a misperception that being on food stamps is somehow a gravy train … but that couldn’t be further from the truth. It’s hard to find nutritional food on such a limited budget, and I know I won’t be able to eat three meals a day on the food I purchased for the challenge. Taking the challenge not only highlights hunger in our country, it also gives me a better understanding of the daily reality of millions of Americans and just how limited their nutrition options are.” 

 Congresswoman Suzan DelBene (WA-01)
“It is critically important to raise awareness and stand up for the millions of families, children and seniors across the country who rely on nutrition assistance programs by ensuring our safety net is adequately funded. Participating in this SNAP challenge is a way to highlight the struggle many people and working families are facing today and to call attention of the need for these life-saving programs.”

List of Members of the U.S. House of Representatives participating in the “SNAP Challenge” (latest update:  June 12, 2013)

1.      Congressman John Carney (D, DE)
2.      Congressman Matthew Cartwright (D, PA-17)
3.      Congressman Joe Crowley (D, NY-14)
4.      Congressman John Conyers (D, MI-13)
5.      Congressman Peter DeFazio (D, OR-04)
6.      Congresswoman Suzan DelBene (D-WA-01)
7.      Congressman Theodore Deutch (D, FL-21)
8.      Congressman Keith Ellison (D, MN-05)
9.      Congresswoman Michelle Lujan Grisham (D, NM-01)
10.  Congressman Hank Johnson (D, GA-04)
11.  Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes-Norton (D-DC)
12.  Congressman Jared Huffman (D, CA-02)
13.  Congresswoman Robin Kelly (D, IL-02)
14.  Congressman Daniel Kildee (D, MI-05)
15.  Congresswoman Ann Kuster (D, NH-02)
16.  Congressman James Langevin (D, RI-02)
17.  Congresswoman Barbara Lee (D, CA-13)
18.  Congressman Sander Levin (D, MI-09)
19.  Congresswoman Doris Matsui (D, CA-06)
20.  Congressman Jim McGovern (D, MA-02)
21.  Congressman Richard Nolan (D, MN-08)
22.  Congressman Beto O'Rourke (D, TX-16)
23.  Congressman Donald Payne, Jr. (D, NJ-10)
24.  Congressman Mark Pocan (D, WI-02)
25.  Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky (D, IL-09)
26.  Congressman Marc Veasey (D, TX-33)
27.  Congressman Melvin Watt (D, NC-12)

  
It is a known fact that if you neglect your own, you will do far worse to those you consider not “your own” kind. And so it is that the gated and guarded and otherwise “protected” officials in the United States of America commit vast and sustained destruction (drone attacks) over here and over there. 

U.S. foreign policy meets U.S. domestic policy. America’s domestic policy is our foreign policy; the misery we inflict abroad is the misery we inflict at home ─ all MADE IN THE USA.



Sources and notes

“American Indian and Alaska Native Poverty Rate About 50 Percent in Rapid City, S.D., and About 30 Percent in Five Other Cities, Census Bureau Reports,” press release, February 20, 2013,  http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/american_community_survey_acs/cb13-29.html

FRAC (Food Research and Action Center)

“FRAC reports on hunger in the United States”
SNAP Participation Increases in March 2013 - Caseloads Reflect Economic Need
SNAP Participation Continues Decline in February 2013 - Caseloads Reflect Economic Need
SNAP Participation Increases in December 2012 - Fluctuations Reflect Economic Need as Well as Disaster Aid
SNAP Participation Increases in November 2012 - Jump Reflects Disaster Benefits for Hurricane Sandy Victims
SNAP Participation Drops in October 2012 - Over-Month-Decline Reflect End of Temporary Hurricane Isaac Relief
SNAP Participation Inched Up Slightly in July 2012 - Caseload Growth Linked to Economic Hardship
More than 46.6 Million Americans Participated in SNAP in June 2012 - Caseload Growth Linked to Economic Hardship

http://frac.org/reports-and-resources/hunger-and-poverty/disparities-in-food-insecurity/
http://frac.org/reports-and-resources/snapfood-stamp-monthly-participation-data/
http://frac.org/federal-foodnutrition-programs/snapfood-stamps/

“FRAC Applauds New Proposed Legislation to Strengthen SNAP Benefits ─ by Contrast, House Agriculture Committee Bill Would Leave Millions of Americans with Empty Cupboards” (Statement attributable to FRAC President Jim Weill)

Press Release lead: June 17, 2013 – Washington, D.C. – As the Farm Bill moves to the floor of the House of Representatives this week, Congress must acknowledge that any cut to SNAP means less food in the cupboards and refrigerators of the hungriest people in America – including children, seniors, working families, unemployed workers, and people with disabilities.…”

Update: legislation sponsors: Congressman Deutch with Representatives Jim McGovern (D-MA), Jim Langevin (D-RI), Gwen Moore (D-WI), John Lewis (D-GA), Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), Gene Green (D-TX), Frederica Wilson (D-FL), Danny Davis (D-IL), Maxine Waters (D-CA),Jerry Nadler (D-NY), Corrine Brown (D-FL), Barbara Lee (D-CA), Betty McCollum (D-MN), Yvette Clarke (D-NY), Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), Dina Titus (D-NV), Steven Horsford (D-NV), Filemon Vela (D-TX), Tony Cardenas (D-CA), Alcee Hastings (D-FL), Greg Meeks (D-NY), John Conyers (D-MI), Bobby Rush (D-IL), Mark Pocan (D-WI), and Pete Gallego (D-TX).

http://frac.org/frac-applauds-new-proposed-legislation-to-strengthen-snap-benefits/

“Hunger in the United States,” says FRAC, “is a problem that can be cured.

The nonprofit, according to its website, “pursues a comprehensive national, state and local strategy ─

…conducting research to document the extent of hunger, its impact, and effective solutions;

…seeking improved federal, state and local public policies that will reduce hunger and under-nutrition;

 …monitoring the implementation of laws and serves as a watchdog of programs;

providing and coordinating, training, technical assistance and support on nutrition and anti-poverty issues to a nationwide network of advocates, service providers, food banks, program administrators and participants, and policymakers; and

…conducting public information campaigns to help promote changes in attitude and policies

Food Research and Action Center (FRAC) “works with hundreds of national, state and local nonprofit organizations, public agencies, corporations and labor organizations to address hunger, food insecurity, and their root cause ─ poverty.” http://frac.org/about/

SNAP CHALLENGE

“Over Two Dozen Members of Congress Protest SNAP Cuts, Live on Food Budget of $4.50/day” (Press June 14, 2013, Representative Barbara Lee, Follow Barbara Lee on Facebook and Twitter at @RepBarbaraLee. To learn more, visit lee.house.gov.)
http://lee.house.gov/press-release/over-two-dozen-members-congress-protest-snap-cuts-live-food-budget-450day

http://lee.house.gov/press-release/full-member-list-congressional-snap-challenge

________________________________________

Bennett's books are available in New York State independent bookstores: Lift Bridge Bookshop: www.liftbridgebooks.com [Brockport, NY]; Sundance Books: http://www.sundancebooks.com/main.html [Geneseo, NY]; Mood Makers Books: www.moodmakersbooks.com [City of Rochester, NY]; Dog Ears Bookstore and Literary Arts Center: www.enlightenthedog.org/ [Buffalo, NY]; Burlingham Books – ‘Your Local Chapter’: http://burlinghambooks.com/ [Perry, NY 14530]; The Bookworm: http://www.eabookworm.com/ [East Aurora, NY] • See also: World Pulse: Global Issues through the eyes of Women: http://www.worldpulse.com/ http://www.worldpulse.com/pulsewire http://www.facebook.com/#!/bennetts2ndstudy

________________________________________